It is a common belief that the social sciences are inferior to the natural ones when it comes to bear the name of “science”. Some sects in the society even deny the claim of the social sciences to be called “science”. Some factions of the society regard social science in general as the inferior ones when compared to the natural science and majority of them even does not regard social sciences as a particular science at all. The current article, assaults this argument by pointing out some aspects of comparison between the two spheres of knowledge aiming to achieve clarity and a final answer as for the matter at hand. These are the aspects that the author of the article distinguished: inalterability of observations, neutrality of observations and clarification, reliability of hypothesis, precision of findings, measurability of phenomena, permanency of numerical relations, predictability of future incidents, distance from everyday events, and standards of admittance and requirements. The aspects represented by the author of the selection will be regarded in this paper in such a way that clarity and clearness may be reached. In this respect, the author of this article made up his mind to divide his work into a few headings, just like what the initial writer did, and each heading of the article will be followed by the authors own interpretation of the matter at hand. In this way, the author tries to arrive at a scholarly work that can clear up the matter at hand.